Kittens & Puppies Suck – Just Kill Them

CrazyiPhoneDeveloper2 The sheer volume of completely whacked out apps never ceases to amaze us. It’s like cruising through the developer nuthouse where every programmer is completely psycho. Seriously – we’re thinking these devs are hopped up on nitrous oxide or just sniffed too much glue in elementary school.

How else can you explain Poop apps? Before the iPhone, we would have never thought of looking between our legs and studying our scuba divers.

Then there’s the Bikini Fart app. If hearing and smelling farts from a chick in a bikini brings you joy … DUDE … you have ISSUES!

Vomit, Urine, Spanking, Lice, Sex Algorithms … the list of freak show apps goes on and on.

One of the most bizarre apps we’ve covered is Sexy Alphabet … targeting individuals who get pleasure from hearing the alphabet recited by a sexual way. Uh hello CRACK HEAD … we don’t give a shiat who’s saying them … the ABC’s are NOT SEXY!

And surprise surprise … from the same developer of Sexy Alphabet (dude call himself  “theM”), comes these two latest classics:

Angry Kittens Attack and Crazy Puppy Massacre 

 

KittyDesc

PuppyDesc

I know this is getting old and tired … but as Apple likes to say …

Want To Kill Kittens And Puppies?
There’s An App For That!

Yeah sicko … welcome to the App Store Asylum. No need to push and shove – there’s plenty of sick and mentally unstable material for everyone. Even those who get off killing kitties and puppies … ha! ha! ha! … APPLE is so brilliantly EVIL!

Kitty22    Puppy33

May 28, 2009 | Filed Under Games 

Comments

  • Has Apple gone nuts?

  • Has Apple gone nuts?

  • Susan Robbins

    Two words: Slippery Slope.

    You know… Freedom of expression and all that. How far do we want Apple to go with deciding what should and should not be an iPhone app? There were a few people who objected, here and there, to Apple pulling the Shake a Baby app, although the vast majority of comments I've see on numerous sites were from people wondering how in blazes it got approved in the first place, and applauding them for pulling it. (And thanks should go to you, I believe, to a good extent for helping bring the issue to Apple's attention.)

    But now these apps. Encouraging the “massacre” of “the most cute puppies in the world” with sniper rifles — well, if they were real puppies, the folks who did the real deed would be locked up. Does encouraging them to do it virtually cause them to go out and do it in reality? I don't think that's ever been proven to be the case. Do most people find the idea of such an app disgusting? I would hope so. Does that make it wrong enough that it shouldn't be allowed? And for what reason, then? I don't know. (In my world, NO ONE WOULD WANT THERE TO BE SUCH A GAME. But it's not my world. People are allowed to be cretins and have icky thoughts as long as they don't hurt real beings.)

    If Apple disallows these apps, perhaps because of public outcry, what about the apps that encourage people to shoot & kill OTHER creatures? Or people? Aren't there a whole lot of games like that? That just ain't gonna happen, is it? Aren't those the games that many people really like?

    Why DO people get off killing virtual people or critters of any kind, anyway? Personally I find it very creepy, but I realize I'm in a small minority.

    I also simply do not know where the line should be drawn on the path between Shake a Baby and war games. Whether one is wanting to lean one way or the other, whichever way you take the first step, I think you are on a Slippery Slope. I don't envy Apple the dilemma.

  • Susan Robbins

    Two words: Slippery Slope.

    You know… Freedom of expression and all that. How far do we want Apple to go with deciding what should and should not be an iPhone app? There were a few people who objected, here and there, to Apple pulling the Shake a Baby app, although the vast majority of comments I've see on numerous sites were from people wondering how in blazes it got approved in the first place, and applauding them for pulling it. (And thanks should go to you, I believe, to a good extent for helping bring the issue to Apple's attention.)

    But now these apps. Encouraging the “massacre” of “the most cute puppies in the world” with sniper rifles — well, if they were real puppies, the folks who did the real deed would be locked up. Does encouraging them to do it virtually cause them to go out and do it in reality? I don't think that's ever been proven to be the case. Do most people find the idea of such an app disgusting? I would hope so. Does that make it wrong enough that it shouldn't be allowed? And for what reason, then? I don't know. (In my world, NO ONE WOULD WANT THERE TO BE SUCH A GAME. But it's not my world. People are allowed to be cretins and have icky thoughts as long as they don't hurt real beings.)

    If Apple disallows these apps, perhaps because of public outcry, what about the apps that encourage people to shoot & kill OTHER creatures? Or people? Aren't there a whole lot of games like that? That just ain't gonna happen, is it? Aren't those the games that many people really like?

    Why DO people get off killing virtual people or critters of any kind, anyway? Personally I find it very creepy, but I realize I'm in a small minority.

    I also simply do not know where the line should be drawn on the path between Shake a Baby and war games. Whether one is wanting to lean one way or the other, whichever way you take the first step, I think you are on a Slippery Slope. I don't envy Apple the dilemma.

  • Susan Robbins

    You know, a good part of me just wants to say: Apple, get this crap — excuse me, KRAPP — out of the App Store. But there's a LOT of other KRAPP that I'd like to see outta there as well. You do NOT have to cater to the lowest common denominator of what passes for civilization, even if you and they want to make a buck. If you did, you'd be making those KRAPPy netbooks you refuse to make.

    I have a bunch of other things I'd like to say to them, but I'll withhold at least until they pick up my dead MacBook Pro and return it fixed. =:-)

  • Susan Robbins

    You know, a good part of me just wants to say: Apple, get this crap — excuse me, KRAPP — out of the App Store. But there's a LOT of other KRAPP that I'd like to see outta there as well. You do NOT have to cater to the lowest common denominator of what passes for civilization, even if you and they want to make a buck. If you did, you'd be making those KRAPPy netbooks you refuse to make.

    I have a bunch of other things I'd like to say to them, but I'll withhold at least until they pick up my dead MacBook Pro and return it fixed. =:-)

  • YES … we believe so!

  • YES … we believe so!

  • “I'm Not Angry”

  • “I'm Not Angry”

  • Mini Me

    I'm Not Angry.

  • Mini Me

    I'm Not Angry.

  • Dee

    I'm Not Angry

  • Dee

    I'm Not Angry

  • Shabbir

    I'm not angry!

  • Shabbir

    I'm not angry!

  • extremocracy

    I'm Not Angry

  • Extremocracy

    I'm Not Angry

  • YES … we believe so!

  • “I'm Not Angry”

  • Mini Me

    I'm Not Angry.

  • Dee

    I'm Not Angry

  • Shabbir

    I'm not angry!

  • Extremocracy

    I'm Not Angry