<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If 30,000 Users Say This App Sucks, Why Is It #1?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://KRAPPS.com/2009/07/16/mirror-free-iphone-app/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://KRAPPS.com/2009/07/16/mirror-free-iphone-app/</link>
	<description>a different and funny iPhone app review site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:44:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KRAPPS</title>
		<link>http://KRAPPS.com/2009/07/16/mirror-free-iphone-app/comment-page-1/#comment-15967</link>
		<dc:creator>KRAPPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KRAPPS.com/?p=3820#comment-15967</guid>
		<description>Very true regarding the &quot;Rate Upon Delete&quot; feature. We&#039;ve always questioned&lt;br&gt;the validity of such a rating since chances are if a user is deleting the&lt;br&gt;app they are unsatisfied and thus a greater propensity to rate the app one&lt;br&gt;star. Certainly seems to be skewing the results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true regarding the &#8220;Rate Upon Delete&#8221; feature. We&#39;ve always questioned<br />the validity of such a rating since chances are if a user is deleting the<br />app they are unsatisfied and thus a greater propensity to rate the app one<br />star. Certainly seems to be skewing the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Markel</title>
		<link>http://KRAPPS.com/2009/07/16/mirror-free-iphone-app/comment-page-1/#comment-15966</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Markel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KRAPPS.com/?p=3820#comment-15966</guid>
		<description>The rankings are based on downloads not the ratings.  The Apple rating system has serious flaws including asking for a rating only when the user deletes the app -- very biased approach...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rankings are based on downloads not the ratings.  The Apple rating system has serious flaws including asking for a rating only when the user deletes the app &#8212; very biased approach&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KRAPPS</title>
		<link>http://KRAPPS.com/2009/07/16/mirror-free-iphone-app/comment-page-1/#comment-13533</link>
		<dc:creator>KRAPPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KRAPPS.com/?p=3820#comment-13533</guid>
		<description>Very true regarding the &quot;Rate Upon Delete&quot; feature. We&#039;ve always questioned&lt;br&gt;the validity of such a rating since chances are if a user is deleting the&lt;br&gt;app they are unsatisfied and thus a greater propensity to rate the app one&lt;br&gt;star. Certainly seems to be skewing the results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true regarding the &#8220;Rate Upon Delete&#8221; feature. We&#39;ve always questioned<br />the validity of such a rating since chances are if a user is deleting the<br />app they are unsatisfied and thus a greater propensity to rate the app one<br />star. Certainly seems to be skewing the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Markel</title>
		<link>http://KRAPPS.com/2009/07/16/mirror-free-iphone-app/comment-page-1/#comment-13532</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Markel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KRAPPS.com/?p=3820#comment-13532</guid>
		<description>The rankings are based on downloads not the ratings.  The Apple rating system has serious flaws including asking for a rating only when the user deletes the app -- very biased approach...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rankings are based on downloads not the ratings.  The Apple rating system has serious flaws including asking for a rating only when the user deletes the app &#8212; very biased approach&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KRAPPS</title>
		<link>http://KRAPPS.com/2009/07/16/mirror-free-iphone-app/comment-page-1/#comment-12201</link>
		<dc:creator>KRAPPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KRAPPS.com/?p=3820#comment-12201</guid>
		<description>yup ... exactly the point ... if some crap is downloaded 1million  &lt;br&gt;times, it does not equate to &quot;good shit&quot;. ironic ... as if Apple has  &lt;br&gt;been Punk&#039;d again, Mirror Free is a joke app, yet Apple deems it &quot;good  &lt;br&gt;shit&quot; and #1 ... jokes on Apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yup &#8230; exactly the point &#8230; if some crap is downloaded 1million  <br />times, it does not equate to &#8220;good shit&#8221;. ironic &#8230; as if Apple has  <br />been Punk&#39;d again, Mirror Free is a joke app, yet Apple deems it &#8220;good  <br />shit&#8221; and #1 &#8230; jokes on Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KRAPPS</title>
		<link>http://KRAPPS.com/2009/07/16/mirror-free-iphone-app/comment-page-1/#comment-12198</link>
		<dc:creator>KRAPPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KRAPPS.com/?p=3820#comment-12198</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for the visit and your sense of humor! Indeed Mirror Free is meant to be a joke ... yet rated #1 by Apple ... which should be the point of the matter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah ... seems very strange that an app&#039;s ranking is simply based on the number of downloads and/or reviews. Everyone would agree ... this is NOT the correct method and is the wrong incentive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But hey, good for you guys ... if Apple ranked our app #1, WTF ... we&#039;d take it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL ... love the new description ... classic!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for the visit and your sense of humor! Indeed Mirror Free is meant to be a joke &#8230; yet rated #1 by Apple &#8230; which should be the point of the matter.</p>
<p>Yeah &#8230; seems very strange that an app&#39;s ranking is simply based on the number of downloads and/or reviews. Everyone would agree &#8230; this is NOT the correct method and is the wrong incentive.</p>
<p>But hey, good for you guys &#8230; if Apple ranked our app #1, WTF &#8230; we&#39;d take it.</p>
<p>LOL &#8230; love the new description &#8230; classic!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imissmyjuno</title>
		<link>http://KRAPPS.com/2009/07/16/mirror-free-iphone-app/comment-page-1/#comment-12187</link>
		<dc:creator>imissmyjuno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://KRAPPS.com/?p=3820#comment-12187</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so glad you brought this up! I saw it up in the Top 25 the other day and thought, what the fuck is this goatshit, is Apple fucking kidding us here? Makes me disgusted. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;there ought to be a class action lawsuit against Apple and a new alternative application store created for users demanding fairness in ratings, a more flexible and speedy approval system, as well as a flagging craigslist-style functionality to tag the applications that obviously sink below the threshold level of brainleak fucking dumb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m so glad you brought this up! I saw it up in the Top 25 the other day and thought, what the fuck is this goatshit, is Apple fucking kidding us here? Makes me disgusted. </p>
<p>there ought to be a class action lawsuit against Apple and a new alternative application store created for users demanding fairness in ratings, a more flexible and speedy approval system, as well as a flagging craigslist-style functionality to tag the applications that obviously sink below the threshold level of brainleak fucking dumb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
